More Comments on the California Marriage Ruling

After I posted an analysis and a list of Alaskan statements and comments celebrating last week's marriage equality ruling by the California Supreme Court, I received two more responses that I want to highlight. 

Jay and Gene Dugan-Brause, founders of Out North Theater in Anchorage, wrote from London to add their comments: "It's a very good decision and one that will be helpful in future litigation." Read their full comment below the original post. 

Also, the chair of the Anchorage Chapter of PFLAG was out of state on Friday, so Board Member Jackie Buckley sent the following comment.

 

Jackie Buckley, PFLAG Anchorage Board Member:
Anchorage PFLAG chapter is thrilled with the 4-3 decision by the California Supreme Court in support of full marriage equality for GLBT Californians. We hope that California will lead the way for more states to loosen their grip on the status quo and open doors for GLBT families, especially along the west coast.  

 

Alaska's Constitution held great promise for GLBT citizens due to Article One's promise of non-discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the addition of Article Twenty-Five, it seemed likely that Alaska might have been the first or second state in the union to have marriage equality across the genders. Unfortunately, for the time being, our own constitution fails us, and remains, as our Alaska Supreme Court stated in their October 28th domestic partner benefits opinion in 2005, out of harmony with itself. At this point, Alaskans do not even have the benefit of civil unions, and there are no employment or public accommodation protections; no laws to support or protect our families. Only municipal and state employees benefitted from the domestic partner ruling. No widespread change moved across the Great Land as a result.  

After Massachusetts allowed marriage equity, its neighbors began to see that the earth did not shatter and that great calamities did not befall the region. Over time, the surrounding states have embraced domestic partnership or civil unions, and have begun the legal processes that may lead to full marriage equality in New England and along the eastern seaboard. The wheels are turning in neighboring states, especially in New York. Perhaps this process is like an inoculation. With activism, desensitization, and funding, perhaps the west coast will be the next region to be infected with change. Moving up the coast, maybe Alaska will be in the path of a tsunami of change.  

1 comment:

E. Ross said...

Posted for Identity:

"The California Supreme Court decision is yet another giant step as the GLBT community marches toward true equality in this country. While most Courts have an understanding of basic and equal human rights, the next big battle will be the attempt of the far right to amend the California constitution. The "right wing" will be bringing in millions of dollars to further such an amendment. Identity, Inc. is still a grassroots organization, and we encourage EVERYONE to work at their personal level to encourage acquaintances "on the fence" to support your true equality. Sad but true, some of our friends who may identify as supportive cannot bring themselves to give gays and lesbians the equality of marriage. Ask your straight friends how they would vote; engage them in personal dialog. Please be sure to encourage all of your Californian friends to register and to vote to support you against an anti-LGBT marriage amendment."

Copyright © 2008 by Bent Alaska.